Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-26960607-20160629031332/@comment-26960607-20161110133506

Gephiltacool wrote: Flamechar33 wrote: Under da ground. Under da grou-don. i know strife admins don't look here anymore, but that doesn't give you a right to start bumping every shitty class concept in history :/

I'd like to say 3 Things...

Number 1: This was only one of the "Rusty" Ones I have. They're not really the best but that doesn't mean they're very crappy. Basically these Classes have Potential if they were made better.

Number 2: Geph, you also have your share of Bad Class Concepts too you know. Maybe you're not into "Trial And Error" Classes I guess. I know you're trying to keep Strife Strife but dude, if you make the standards a lot higher, you'll even give the devs themselves a hard time (even though they don't pay any attention to the Wiki).

If your regards are meant for joking around, it's okay. I can tell what you're looking forward to in Class Concepts but that doesn't mean Raining On Parades, Bursting Bubbles, and being a Party Pooper is always necessary. Oh by the way, I entirely disregard all of your demotivating Strife Justice Comments. Just because you hate it doesn't mean that you have to make others hate it. I don't mind people stating their opinions as long as they don't poison other people's own opinions.

Number 3: Flame, dude... Why the hell did you put this Class Concept in your "Elements" Post? As I said in the first thing I said, this is one of my "Rusty Concepts". They're rather ineffective. You really should remove it from the List but if you really want to keep it there, I'll have to change this Class Concept entirely or adjust some other things.